Gatekeepers vs. Literacy
Within our views of literacy, we are considered gatekeepers. Gatekeepers block out others thoughts, actions, and spaces due to what they believe is allowed. We all have our own theory on what are good examples of literacy and what are bad examples of literacy. As an individual, others teach you what is the correct use of writing and literacy. Therefore, when it comes to others views towards literacy, you become a gatekeeper by not agreeing within their concept and blocking their ideas from you. Also our viewpoints with our gateway can allow us to agree on the use of literacy with others.
The Elements of Literacy makes a clear statement of how gatekeeping can be used within literacy. Within the article, I was surprised by how most views of teaching are different from others. “If you teach a child how to read, they will pass a reading test” is a good quote that explains how a teaching process shows gatekeeping. This quote is saying that if the teacher shows the student their opinion on how to read that they will automatically pass the test. By this meaning, the teacher is blocking out the process of inquiry and teaching the student on what he or she believes is good reading. Rather than actually learning the material, the students now do what they need to do in order to “get by” and pass. This could also be brought up within the articles “Teaching as Un-teaching” and the “Five Paragraph Essay and the Defect Model of Education.” Teaching as Un-teaching shows us the different views on high school and college literacy. It shows how High School thesis statements are now viewed different within the writing programs in college. I can relate to this article now seeing that in college you don’t necessarily need a thesis statement. The Professors and Teachers are gatekeepers toward the students on the specific way of writing to make them more liberate throughout their own views. This can also relate to the Five Paragraph Essay and The Defect Model of education when it comes to the format amongst the students papers. The article argues that some schools see the perfect format within a paper has an Introduction, three supporting paragraphs, and a final conclusion. Although I was taught this way throughout high school, I do agree with the article and see how the schools can be gatekeepers. Why should the student’s grade be submitted off of his format on the paper and not what information he has provided? Shouldn’t the prompt and information be more important than the format of the paper? Literacy should not base off of each gatekeepers views. There will always be different views towards literacy, but all that should matter is the understanding towards the topic of literacy.